The Function and Place of Conscience in Relation to the Laws of Men by Theodore Parker
Author: Unknown
Date: 0101-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Making of America Books Basic | Boolean | Proximity |

Bibliographic | Search History UMDL Texts home U of M login View bookbag your bookbag has 0 items

Home Search BrowseHelp

list of all pages | add to bookbag

Title:The function and place of conscience in relation to the laws of men; a sermon for the times; preached at the Melodeon, on Sunday, September 22, 1850.

Author:Parker, Theodore, 1810-1860.

Availability:These pages may freely searched and displayed.

Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please contact umdl-info@umich.edu for more information.

Print Source:The function and place of conscience in relation to the laws of men; a sermon for the times; preached at the Melodeon, on Sunday, September 22, 1850.

Parker, Theodore, 1810-1860.

40 p. 23 cm.

Boston,

Crosby & Nichols,

1850.

Page 1 view page image

THE FUNCTION AND PLACE OF CONSCIENCE, IN RELATION TO THE LAWS OF MEN; A SERMON FOR THE TIMES; PREACHED AT TIIE MELODEON, ON SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1850. BY THEODORE PARKER, MINISTER OF THE XXVIII. CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH IN

BOSTON. PUBLISHED BY REQUEST. S-BOSTON: C OSBY & NICHOLS, I e, 1 8 50. ~

! 4”lf 4

Page 2 view page image

~~  ft a 4 I3 I 0 p

Page 3 view page image

4,. - -”.” G-lB ANN-If ;Am Ad ru,AN SCRIPTURE LESSON. OLD TESTAMENT.

Moreover, there went out a decree to the neighbour cities of the heathen, by the suggestion of Ptolemee, against the Jews, that they should observe the same fashions, and be partakers of their sacrifices: And whoso would not conform themselves to the manners of the Gentiles should be put to death. Then might a man have seen the present misery. For there were two women brought, who had circumcised their children; whom when they had openly led round about the city, the babes hanging at their breasts, they cast them down headlong from the wall. And others, that had run together into caves near by, to keep the sabbath-day secretly, being discovered to Philip, were all burnt together, because they made a conscience to help themselves for the honour of the most sacred day. Eleazar, one of the principal scribes, an aged man, and of a wellfavoured countenance, was constrained to open his mouth, and to eat swine’s flesh. But he, choosing rather to die gloriously, than to live stained with such an abomination, spit it forth, and came of his own accordtl to the torment, as it behoved them to come, that are resolute to stand out against such things as are not lawful for love of life to be tasted. But they that had the charge of that wicked feast, for the old acquaintance they had with the man, taking him aside, besought him to bring flesh of his own provision, such as was lawful for him to use, and make as if he did eat of the flesh taken from the sacrifice commanded by the king; that in so doing he might be delivered from death, and for the old friendship with them find favour.

But he began to consider discreetly, and as became his age, and the excellency of his ancient years, and the honour of his grey head, whereunto he was come, and his most honest education from a child, or rather the holy law made and given by God: therefore he answered accordingly, and willed them straightways to send him to the grave. For it becometh not our age, said he, in any wise to dissemble, whereby many young persons might think that Eleazar, being fourscore years old and ten, were now gone to a strange religion. And so they, through mine hypocrisy, and desire to live a little time, and a moment longer, should be deceived by me, and I get a stain to mine old age, and make it abominable. For though for the present time I should be delivered from the punishment of men: yet should I not escape the hand of the Almighty, neither alive, nor dead. Wherefore now, manfully changing this life, I will shew myself such an one as mine age requireth, and leave a notable example to such as be young, to die willingly and courageously for the honourable and holy laws.

And when he had said these words, immediately he went to the torment: They that led him changing the good will they bare him a little before into hatred, because the aforesaid speeches proceeded, as they thought, from a desperate mind. But when he was ready to die with stripes, he groaned, and said, It is manifest unto the Lord, that hath the holy knowledge, that whereas I might have been delivered from death, I now endure sore pains in body by being beaten: but in soul am well content to suffer these things, because I fear him. And thus this man died, leaving his death for an example of a noble courage, and a memorial of virtue, not only unto young men, but unto all his nation. I I I l P-1

Page 4 view page image

4 It came to pass also, that seven brethren with their mother were taken and compelled by the king against the law to taste swine’s flesh, and were tormented with scourges and whips. But one of them that spake first said thus, What wouldest thou ask or learn of us? we are ready to die, rather than to transgress the laws of our fathers. Then the king, being in a rage, commanded pans and caldrons to be made hot: Which forthwith being heated, he commanded to cut out the tongue of him that spake first, and to cut off the utmost parts of his body, the rest of his brethren and his mother looking on. Now when he was thus maimed in all his members, he commanded him being yet alive to be brought to the fire, and to be fried in the pan: and as the vapour of the pan was for a good space dispersed, they exhorted one another with the mother to die manfully, saying thus, The Lord God looketh upon us, and in truth hath comfort in us, as Moses in his song, which witnessed to their faces, declared, saying, And he shall be comforted in his servants. So when the first was dead after this manner, they brought the second to make him a mocking-stock: and when they had pulled off the skin of his head with the hair, they asked him, Wilt thou eat, before thou be punished throughout every member of thy body? But he answered in his own language, and said, No. Wherefore he also received the next torment in order, as the former did. After him was the third made a mocking-stock: and when he was required, he put out his tongue, and that right soon, holding forth his hands manfully, and said courageously, These I had from heaven; and for His laws I despise them; and from Him I hope to receive them again. Now when this man was dead also, they tormented and mangled the fourth in like manner. Afterward they brought the fifth also, and mangled him. After him also they brought the sixth. But’the mother was marvellous above all, and worthy of honourable memory: for when,he saw her seven sons slain within the space of one day, she bare it with a good courage, because of the hope that she had in the Lord. Yea, she exhorted every one of them in her own language, filled with courageous spirits; and stirring up her womanish thoughts with a manly stomach, she said unto them, I cannot tell how ye came into my womb; for I neither gave you breath nor life, neither was it I that formed the members of every one of you; but doubtless the Creator of the world, who formed the generation of man, and found out the beginning of all things, will also of His own mercy give you breath and life again, as ye now regard not your ownselves for His laws’ sake. row Antiochus, thinking himself despised, and suspecting it to be a reproachful speech, whilst the youngest was yet alive, did not only exhort him by words, but also assured him with oaths, that he would make him both a rich and a happy man, if he would turn from the laws of his fathers; and that also he would take. him for his friend, and trust him with affairs. But when the young man would in no case hearken unto him, the king called his mother, and exhorted her that she would counsel the young man to save his life. And when he had exhorted her with many words, she promised him that she would counsel her son. But she bowing herself toward him, laughing the cruel tyrant to scorni, spake in her country language on this manner; O my son, have pity upon me that bare thee nine months in my womb, and gave thee suck three years, and nourished thee, and brought thee up unto this age, and endured the troubles of education. I beseech thee, my son, look upon the heaven and the earth, and all that is therein, and consider that God made them of things that were not; and so was mankind made likewise. Fear not this tormentor, but, being worthy of thy brethren, take thy death, that I may receive thee again in mercy with thy brethren. While she was yet speaking these words, the young man said, Whom wait ye for? I will not obey the king’s commandment: but I will obey the commandment of the law that was given unto our fathers by Moses. Then the king, being in a rage, handled him worse than all the rest, and I I I I 0 , y ” 9

Page 5 view page image

5 took it grievously that he was mocked. So this man died undefiled, and put his whole trust in the Lord. Last of all, after the sons, the mother died.-2 Alaccabees, VI. 8-11, 18 - 31, VII. 1 - 6, 10 - 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 29, 30, 39-41. NEW TESTAMENT. Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; and ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against-them and the Gentiles. But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak; for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you. And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death. And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.

But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel till the Son of man be come. The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his lord. It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house of Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household? Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed; and hid, tha, shall not be known. What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light: and what ye hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the house-tops. And fear not’them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father. But the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Fear ye not therefore; ye are of more value than many sparrows. Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven. Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughterin-law against her mother-in-law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it. He that receiveth you, receiveth me; and he that receiveth me, receiveth him that sent me. He that receiveth a prophet, in the name of a prophet, shall receive a prophet’s reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man, in the name of a righteous man, shall receive a righteous man’s reward. And whosoever shall give to drink unto one of these little ones a cup of cold water only in the name of a disciple, verily I say unto you, He shall in no wise lose his reward.

Come unto me all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me: for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.- Mathet? X., 16 - 42; XI., 28 - 30. w I I

Page 6 view page image

‘t 9’ I ‘A I .;z

Page 7 view page image

SE R MON. ” HEREIN DO I EXERCISE MYSELF TO HAVE ALWAYS A CONSCIENCE VOID

OF OFFENCE TOWARD GOD AND TOWARD MEN.”’ Acts xxiv, 16. THERE are some things which are true, independent of all human opinions. Such things we call facts. Thus it is true that one and one are equal to two, that the earth moves round the sun, that all men have certain natural and unalienable rights, rights which a man can alienate only for himself, and not for another. No man made these things true; no man can make them false. If all the men in Jerusalem and ever so many more, if all the men in the world, were to pass a unanimous vote that one and one were not equal to two, that the earth did not move round the sun, that all men had not natural and unalienable rights, the opinion would not alter the fact, nor make truth false and falsehood true. So there are likewise some things which are right, independent of all human opinions. Thus it is right to love a man and not to hate him, to do him justice and not injustice, to allow him the natural rights which he has not alienated. No man made these things right; no man can make them wrong. If all the men in Jerusalem and ever so many more, if all the men in the world, were to pass a unanimous vote that it was right to hate a man and not love him, right to do him injustice and not justice, right to I i I

Page 8 view page image

8 deprive him of his natural rights not alienated by himself, the opinion would not alter the fact, nor make right wrong and wrong right. There are certain constant and general facts which occur in the material world, the world of external perception, which represent what are called the laws of matter, in virtue of which things take place so and not otherwise. These laws are the same every where and always; they never change. They are not made by men, but only discovered by men, are inherent in the constitution of matter, and seem designed to secure the welfare of the material world.

These natural laws of matter, inherent in its constitution, are never violated, nor can be, for material nature is passive, or at least contains no element or will that is adverse to the will of God, the ultimate cause of these laws as of matter itself. The observance of these laws is a constant fact of the universe; ” the most ancient heavens” thereby “are fresh and strong.” These laws represent the infinity of God in the world of matter, His infinite power, wisdom, justice, love and holiness. So there are likewise certain constant and general facts which occur in what may be called the spiritual world, the world of internal consciousness.

They represent the laws of spirit-that is of the human spirit in virtue of which things are designed to take place so and not otherwise. These laws are the same every where and always; they never change. They are not made by men, but only discovered by men. They are inherent in the constitution of man, and as you cannot conceive of a particle of matter without extension, impenetrability, figure and so on, no more can you conceive of man without these laws inhering in him. They seem designed to secure the welfare of the spirit .t

Page 9 view page image

9 ual world. They represent the infinity of God in the world of man, His infinite power, wisdom, justice, love and holiness. But while matter is stationary, bound by necessity, and man is progressive and partially free, to the extent of a certain tether, so it is plain that there may be a will in the world of man adverse to the will of God, and thus the laws of man’s spirit may be violated to a certain extent. The laws of matter depend for their execution only on the infinite will of God, and so cannot be violated. The laws of man depend for their execution also on the finite will of man, and so may be broken.* Let us select a portion of these laws of the human spirit, such as relate to a man’s conduct in dealing with his fellow-men, a portion of what are commonly called Moral Laws, and examine them. They partake of the general characteristics mentioned above; they are universal and unchangeable, are only discovered and not made by man, are inherent in man, designed to secure his welfare, and represent the infinity of God. These laws are absolutely right; to obey them is to be and do absolutely right. So being and doing a man answers the moral purpose of his existence, and attains moral manhood. If I and all men keep all the laws of man’s spirit, I have peace in my own heart, peace with my brother, peace with my God; I have my delight in myself, in my brother, in my God, they theirs and God His in me. W’hat is absolutely right is commonly called Justice. It is the point in morals common to me and all man * The terms laws of the human spirit, spiritual laws, &c., are sometimes used to denote exclusively those laws which man must keep, not merely what he ought to keep, laws in relation to which mad has no more freedom than a mass of marble. The words are used above in a different sense. 4 I I

Page 10 view page image

10 kind, common to me and God, to mankind and God; the point where all duties unite to myself, my brethren, and my God; the point where all interests meet and balance-my interests, those of mankind, and the interests of God. When Justice is done all is har mony and peaceful progress in the world of man; but when Justice is not done, the reverse follows - discord and confusion, for injustice is not the point where all duties and all interests meet and balance, not the point of morals common to mankind and me, or to us and God. We may observe and study the constant facts of the material world, thus learn the laws they represent, and so get at a theory of the world which is founded on the facts thereof Such a theory is true; it represents the thought of God, the infinity of God.

Then for every point of theory we have a point of fact. Instead of pursuing this course we may neglect these constant facts, with the laws they represent, and jump at a theory which shall not rest on these facts.

Such a theory will be false and will represent the imperfection of men and not the facts of the universe and the infinity of God. In like manner we may study the constant facts of the spiritual world, and, in special, of man’s moral nature and thereby obtain a rule to regulate our conduct. If this rule is founded on the constant facts of man’s moral nature, then it will be absolutely right, and represent Justice, the thought of God, the infinity of God, and for every point of moral theory we shall have a moral fact. Instead of pursuing that course we may jump at a rule for our conduct, and so get a theory which shall not rest on those facts. Such a rule will be wrong, representing only the imperfection of men. ‘,’ ‘a

Page 11 view page image

11 In striving to learn the laws of the universe the wisest men often go astray, propound theories which do not rest upon facts, and lay down human rules for the conduct of the universe which do not agree with its nature.

But the universe is not responsible for that; material nature takes no notice thereof The opinion of an astronomer, of the American Academy, does not alter a law of the material universe, or a fact therein. The philosophers once thought that the sun went round the earth, framing laws on that assumption; but that did not make it a fact, the sun did not go out of his way to verify the theory, but kept to the law of God, and swung the earth round him once a year, say the philosophers what they might say, leaving them to learn the fact, and thereby correct their theory. In the same way before men attain a knowledge of the absolute right, they often make theories which do not rest upon the facts of man’s moral nature, and enact human rules for the conduct of men, which do not agree with the moral nature of man. These are rules which men make and do not find made.

They are not a part of man’s moral nature, writ therein, and so obligatory thereon, no more than the false rules for the conduct of matter are writ therein, and so obligatory thereon. You and I are no more morally bound to keep such rules of conduct, because king Pharaoh or king People say we shall, than the sun is materially bound to go round the earth every day, because Hipparchus and Ptolemy say it does. The opinion or command of a king, or a people, can no more change a fact and alter a law of man’s nature, than the opinion of a philosopher can do this in material nature.

We learn the laws of matter slowly by observation, I I I

Page 12 view page image

12 experiment, and induction, and only get an outside knowledge thereof, as objects of thought. In the same way we might study the facts of man’s moral nature, and arrive at rules of conduct and get a merely outside acquaintance with the moral law, as something wholly external. The law might appear curious, useful, even beautiful, moral gravitation as wonderful as material attraction. But no Sense of JDuty would attach us to it. In addition to the purely intellectual powers, we have a faculty whose special function it is to discover the rules for a man’s moral conduct.

This is Conscience, called also by many names. As the mind has for its object absolute Truth, so Conscience has for its object absolute Justice.

Conscience enables us not merely to learn the right by experiment and induction, but intuitively and in advance of experiment; so in addition to the experimental way, whereby we learn Justice from the facts of human history, we have a transcendental way, and learn it from the facts of human nature, from immediate consciousness. It is the function of Conscience to discover to men the moral law of God. It will not do this with infallible certainty, for, at its best estate, neither Conscience nor any other faculty of man is absolutely perfect, so as never to mistake.

Absolute perfection belongs only to the faculties of God. But Conscience, like each other factulty, is relatively perfect, -is adequate to the purpose God meant it for. It is often immature, in the young, who have not had time for the growth and ripening of the faculty, and in the old, who have checked and hindered its development. Here it is feeble from neglect, there from abuse. It may give an imperfect answer to the question, WVhat is absolutely right? I t ;4

Page 13 view page image

13 Now, though the Conscience of a man lacks the absolute perfection of that of God, in all that relates to my dealing with men, it is still the last standard of appeal. I will hear what my friends have to say, what public opinion has to offer, what the best men can advise me to, then I am to ask my own Conscience, and follow its decision-not that of my next friend, the public, or the best of men. I will not say that my Conscience will always disclose to me the absolutely right according to the Conscience of God, but it will disclose the relatively right, what is my conviction of right to-day, with all the light I can get on the matter, and as all I can know of the absolute right is my conviction thereof, so I must be true to that conviction. Then I am faithful to my own Conscience and faithfill to my God. If I do the best thing I can know to-day, and to-morrow find a better one and do that, I am not to be blamed, nor to be called a sinner against God because not so just to-day, as I shall be to-nmorrow. I am to do God’s will soon as I know it, not before, and to take all possible pains to find it out; but am not to blame for acting childish when a child, nor to be ashamed of it when grown up to be a man.

Such is the Function of Conscience. Having determined what is absolutely right by the Conscience of God, or at least relatively right according to my Conscience to-day, then it becomes my duty to keep it. I owe it to God to obey His law, or what I deem His law; that is my Duty. It may be uncomfortable to keep it, unpopular, contrary to my present desires, to my passions, to my immediate interests; it may conflict with my plans in life: that makes no difference. I owe entire allegiance to my God. It is

Page 14 view page image

14 a duty to keep His law, a personal duty, my duty as a man. I owe it to myself, for I am to keep the integrity of my own consciousness; I owe it to my brother and to my God. Nothing can absolve me from this duty, neither the fact that it is uncomfortable or unpopular, nor that it conflicts with my desires, my passions, my immediate interests and my plans in life. Such is the Place of Conscience amongst other faculties of my nature. I believe all this is perfectly plain, but now see what it leads to. In the complicated relations of human life, various rules for the moral conduct of men have been devised, some of them in the form of statute-laws, some in the form of customs, and, in virtue of these rules, certain artificial demands are made of men, which have no foundation in the moral nature of man; these demands are thought to represent duties. We have the same word to describe what I ought to do as subject to the law of God, and what is demanded of me by custom, or the statute. We call each a duty. Hence comes no small confusion; the conventional and official obligation is thought to rest on the same foundation as the natural and personal duty. As the natural duty is at first sight a little vague, and not written out in the law-book, or defined by custom, while the conventional obligation is well understood, men think that in case of any collision between the two, the natural duty must give way to the official obligation. For clearness’ sake, the natural and personal obligation to keep the law of God as my Conscience declares it, I will call Duty; the conventional and official obligation to comply with some custom, keep some

Page 15 view page image

15 statute, or serve some special interest, I will call Busi ness. Here then are two things-my natural and personal duty, my conventional and official business. Which of the two shall give way to the other,- personal duty or official business. Let it be remembered that I am a MAN first of all, and all else that I am is but a modification of my manhood, which makes me a clergyman, a fisherman, or a statesman; but the clergy, the fish, and the state are not to strip me of my manhood. They are valuable in so far as they serve my manhood, not as it serves them. My official business as clergyman, fisherman, or statesman is always beneath my personal duty as man. In case of any conflict between the two, the natural duty ought to prevail and carry the day before the official business; for the natural duty represents the permanent law of God, the absolute right, Justice the balance-point of all interests, while the official business represents only the transient conventions of men, some partial interest; and besides the man who owes the personal duty is immortal, while the officer who performs the official business is but for a time. At death the man is to be tried by the Justice of God, for the deeds done, and character attained, for his natural duty, but he does not enter the next life as a clergyman with his sur plice and prayer-book, or a fisherman with his angles and net, nor yet as a statesman with his franking privilege and title of Honorable and Member of Con gress. The officer dies, of a vote or a fever. The man lives forever. From the relation between a man and his occupation it is plain, in general, that all con ventional and official business is to be overruled by natural, personal duty. This is the great circle, drawn by God and discovered by Conscience, which girdles I ‘I ;4 i1 i i I II I II 1.1 i ‘i “I 4 i I I .!. I I I -i

Page 16 view page image

16 my sphere, including all the smaller circles, and itself included by none of them. The law of God has emi nent domain every where, over the private passions of Oliver and Charles, the special interests of Carthage and of Rome, over all customs, all official business, all precedents, all human statutes, all treaties between Judas and Pilate, or England and France, over all the conventional affairs of one man or mankind. My own Conscience is to declare that law for me, yours for you, and is before all private passions, or public interests, the decision of majorities, and a world full of precedents. You may resign your office and escape its obligations, forsake your country and owe it no allegiance, but you cannot move out of the dominions of God, nor-escape where Conscience has not eminent domain. See some examples of a conflict between the personal duty and the official business. A man may be a clergyman, and it may be his official business to expound and defend the creed which is set up for him by his employers, his bishop, his association, or his parish, to defend and hold it good against all comers; it may be, also, in a certain solemn sort to please the audience, who come to be soothed, caressed, and comforted, -to represent the average of religion in his society, and so to bless popular virtues and ban unpopular vices, but never to shake off or even jostle with one of his fingers the load of sin, beloved and popular, which crushes his hearers down till they are bowed together and can in no wise lift themselves up; unpopular excellence he is to call fanaticism if not infidelity. But his natural duty as a man, standing in this position, overrides his official business and commands him to tell men of the false things in their creed, of great I

Page 17 view page image

truths not in it; commands him to inform his audience with new virtue, to represent all of religion he can attain, to undo the heavy burthens of popular sin, private or national, and let the men oppressed therewith go free. Excellence, popular or odious, he is to commend by its own name, to stimulate men to all nobleness of character and life, whether it please or offend. This is his duty, however, uncomfortable, unpopular, against his desires, and conflicting with his immediate interests and plans of life.

Which shall he do. his official business, and pimp and pander to the public lust, with base compliance serving the popular idols, which here are Money.and Respectability, or shall he serve his God? That is the question. If the man considers himself substantially a man, and accidentally a clerg)man, he will perform his natural duty; if he counts the priesthood his substance, and manhood an accident of that, he will do only his official business. I may be a merchant, and my official business may be to buy, and sell, and get gain; I may see that the traffic in ardent spirits is the readiest way to accomplish this. So it becomes my official business to make rum, sell rum, and by all means to induce men to drink it. But presently I see that the common use of it makes the thriving unthrifty, the rich less wealthy, the poor miserable, the sound sick, and the sane.mad; that it brings hundreds to the jail, thousands to the almshouse, and millions to, poverty and shame, producing an amount of suffering, wretchedness, and sin, beyond the power of man to picture or conceive. Then my natural duty as man is very clear, very imperative.

Shall I sacrifice my manhood to money? - the integrity of my consciousness to my gains by rumselling? 2 Iill .I I i I

Page 18 view page image

18 That is the question. And my answer will depend on the fact whether I am more a man, or more a rumseller. Suppose I compromise the matter, and draw a line somewhere between my natural duty as man, and my official business as rumseller, and for every three cents that I make by iniquity, give one cent to the American Tract Society, or the Board for Foreign Missions, or the Unitarian Association, or the excellent Society for promoting the Gospel among the Indians (and others,) in North America.

That does not help the matter; business is not satisfied, though I draw the line never so near to money, nor Conscience, unless the line comes up to my duty. I am a citizen, and the State says “You must obey all the laws made by the proper authorities; that is your official business!” Suppose it is a law adverse to the natural law of God, and the convictions of my own Conscience, and I plead that in abatement of my obligation to keep the law: the State says “obey it, none the less, or we will hang you. Religion is an excellent thing in every matter except politics, there it seems to make men mad.” Shall I keep the commandment of men, or the law of my God?

A law was once enacted by King Pharaoh for the destruction of the Israelites in Egypt; it was the official business of all citizens to aid in their destruction: “Pharaoh charged all his people saying, Every son that is born ye shall cast into the river, and every daughter ye shall save alive.” It was the official business of every Egyptian who found a Hebrew boy to throw him into the Nile, - if he refused, he offended against the peace and dignity of the kingdom of Egypt, and the form of law in such case made and ‘t 4 v

Page 19 view page image

19 provided. But if he obeyed, he murdered a man. Which should he obey, the Lord Pharaoh, or the Lord God? That was the question. I make no doubt that the priests of Osiris, Orus, Apis, Isis, and the judges, and the justices of the peace and quorum, and the members of Congress of that time said, “Keep the king’s commandment, oh ye that worship the crocodile and fear the cat, or ye shall not sleep in a whole skin any longer!” So said every thing that loveth and maketh a lie. King Charles II. made a law some one hundred and ninety years ago, to punish with death, the remnant of the nine and fifty judges who had brought his father’s head to the block, teaching kings “that they also had a joint in their necks.” He called on all his subjects to aid in the capture of these judges. It was made their official business as citizens to do so; a reward was offered for the apprehension of some of them “alive or dead;” punishment hung over the head of any who should harbor or conceal them. Three of these regicides, who had adjudged a king for his felony, came to New England. Many Americans knew where they were, and thought the condemnation of Charles I.

was the best thing these judges ever did. With that conviction ought they to have delivered up these fugitives, or afforded them shelter? In time of peril, when officers of the English government were on the look out for some of these men, a clergyman in the town where one of them was concealed, preached, it is said, on the text “Bewray not him that wandereth,” an occasional sermon, and put the duty of a man far before the business of a citizen. When Sir Edmund Andros was at New Haven looking after one of the judges, and attended public worship in the same meeting I 4 I I I

Page 20 view page image

20 house with the fugitive, the congregation sung an awful hymn in his very ears.* Would the men of Connecticut have done right, bewraying him that wandered, and exposing the outcast, to give up the man who had defended the liberties of * Why dost thou, Tyrant, boast abroad thy wicked works to praise? Dost thou not know there is a God, whose mercies last alwaies? On mischiefe why sett’st thou thy minde, and wilt not walke upright? Thou hast more lust false tales to find, than bring the truth to light. Thou dost delight in fraud and guile, in mischiefe, bloud and wrong. Thy lips have learned the flattering stile, oh false deceitful tongue. Therefore shall God for aye confound, and pluck thee from thy place; Thy seed root out from off the ground, and so shall thee deface.

The just, when they behold thy fall, with feare shall praise the Lord; And in reproach of thee withall, crie out with one accord: - Behold the man that woulde not take the Lord for his’defence; But of his goods his God did make, and trust his corrupt sense. But I, as olive, fresh and green, shall spring and spread abroad; For why? my trust all times hath been, upon the living God I For this therefore will I give praise to Thee with heart and voyce; I will set forth Thy name alwayes, where’in Thy saints rejoice. [Psalm lii, in Sternhold and Hopkins.] ‘t I I

Page 21 view page image

21 the world and the Rights of mankind against a tyrant, - give him up because a wanton king, and his loose men and loose women, made it a law.

One of the regicides dwelt in peace eight and twenty years in New England, a monument of the virtue of the people. Of old time the Roman law commanded the Christians to sacrifice to Jupiter; they deemed it the highest sin to do so, but it was their official business as Roman citizens. Some of them were true to their natural duty as men, and took the same Cross Jesus had borne before them; Peter and John had said at their outset to the authorities -“whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye.” The Emperor once made it the official business of every citizen to deliver up the Christians.

But God made it no man’s duty. Nay, it was each man’s duty to help them.

In such cases what shall a man do. You know what we think of men who comply basely, and save their life with the loss of their soul. You know how the Christian world honors the Saints and Martyrs, who laid down their lives for the sake of Truth and Right; a handful of their dust, which was.

quieted of its trouble by the headsman’s axe seventeen hundred years ago, and is now gathered from the catecombs of Saint Agnes at Rome - why it is enough to consecrate half of the catholic churches in New England. As I have stood among their graves, have handled the instruments with which they tasted of bitter death, and crumbled their bones in my hands, I have thought there was a little difference between their religion, and the pale decency that haunts the churches of our time and is afraid lest it lose its dividends, or its respectability, or hurt its usefulness, which is in no danger. I I I

Page 22 view page image

22 Do I spealk of Martyrs for Conscience’ sake?. To-day is St. Maurice’s day, consecrated to him and the “The beean legion.” Maurice appears to have been a military tribune in the Christian legion, levied in the Thebais, a part of Egypt. In the latter part of the third century this legion was at Octodurum, near the little village of Martigni, in Valais, a Swiss Canton, under the command of Maximian, the associate emperor, just then named Herculeus, going to fight the Bagaude. The legion was ordered to sacrifice to the Gods after the heathen fashion. The soldiers refused; every tenth man was hewn down by Maximian’s command. They would not submit, and so the whole legion, as the Catholic legends tell us, perished there on the 22d of September fifteen hundred and fifty three years ago this day. Perhaps the story is not true; it is probable that the number of martyrs is much exaggerated, for six thousand soldiers would not stand still and be slaughtered without striking a blow. But the fact that the catholic church sets apart one day in the calendar to honor this alleged heroism, shows the value men put on fidelity to Conscience in such cases.

Last winter a law for the capture of fugitive slaves was introduced into the Senate of the United States of America; the senator who so ably represents the opinions and wishes of the controlling men of this city, proposed to support that bill, ” with all its provisions to the fullest extent; ” that bill, with various alterations, some for the better, others for the worse, has become a law-it received the vote of the representative from Boston, who was NoT sent there, I hope, for the purpose of voting for it. That law, allows the slaveholder, or his agent, to come here, and by summary -1 t N I

Page 23 view page image

28 process seize a fugitive slave, and, without the formality of a trial by jury, to carry him back to eternal bondage. The law makes it the official business of certain magistrates to aid in enslaving a man; it empowers them to call out force enough to overcome any resistance which may be offered, to summon the bystanders to aid in that work. It provides a punishment for any one who shall aid and abet, directly or indirectly, and harbor or conceal the man who is seeking to maintain his natural and unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. He may be fined a thousand dollars, imprisoned six months, and be liable to a civil action for a thousand dollars more! This law is not to be laid to the charge of the slaveholders of the South alone; its most effective supporters are northern men; Boston is more to be blamed for it than Charleston or Savannah, for nearly a thousand persons of this city and neighborhood, most of them men of influence through money if by no other means, addressed a letter of thanks to the distinguished man who had volunteered to support that infamous bill, telling him that he had “convinced the understanding and touched the conscience of the nation.” A man falls low when he consents to be a slave, and is spurned for his lack of manhood; to consent to be a catcher of fugitive slaves is to fall lower yet; but to consent to be the defender of a slave catcher-it is seldom that human nature is base enough for that. But such ex amples are found in this city! This is now the law of the land. It is the official business of judges, commis sioners and marshals, as magistrates, to execute the law and deliver a fugitive up to slavery; it is your official business and mine, as citizens, when legally summoned, to aid in capturing the man.

Does the I I I

Page 24 view page image

24 law make it any man’s duty. The natural duty to keep the law of God overrides the obligation to observe any human statute, and continually commands us to love a man and not hate him, to do him Justice, and not injustice, to allow him his natural rights not alienated by himself, yes to defend him in them, not only by all means legal but by all means moral.

Let us look a little at our duty under this law. If a man falls into the water and is in danger of drown ing, it is the natural duty of the bystanders to aid in pulling him out, even at the risk of wetting their gar ments. We should think a man a coward who could swim and would not save a drowning girl for fear of spoiling his coat. He would be indictable at common law. If a troop of wolves or tigers were about to seize a min, and devour him, and you and I could help him, it would be our duty to do so, even to peril our own limbs and life for that purpose. If a man undertakes to murder or’steal a man, it is the duty of the bystanders to help their brother, who is in peril, against wrong from the two legged man, as much as against the four legged beast. But suppose the invader who seizes the man is an officer of the United States, has a commission in his pocket, a warrant for his deed in his hand, and seizes as a slave a man who has done nothing to alienate his natural rights, does that give him any more natural right to enslave a man than he had before? Can any piece of parchment make Right wrong, and Wrong right? The fugitive has been a slave before: does the wrong you committed yesterday give you a natural right to commit wrong afresh and continually? Because you enslaved this man’s father have you a natural right to enslave his child-? The same right I I

Page 25 view page image

25 you would have to murder a man because you butchered his father first.

The right to murder is as much transmissible by inheritance as the right to enslave! It is plain to me that it is the natural duty of citizens to rescue every fugitive slave from the hands of the marshal who essays to return him to bondage, to do it peaceably if they can, forcibly if they must, but by all means-to do it. Will you stand by and see your countrymen, your fellow citizens of Boston, sent off to slavery by some commissionerS Shall I see my own parishioners taken from under my eyes and carried: back to bondage, by a man whose constitutional business it is to work wickedness. by statute? Shall I. never lift an arm to protect him wVhen I consent to that, you may call me a hireling shepherd, an infidel, a wolf in sheep’s clothing, even a defender of slave catching if you will, and I will confess I was a poor dumb dog, barking always at the. moon, but silent as the moon when the murderer comes near. I am not a man who love violence. I respect the sacredness of human life. - But this I say, solemnly, that I will do all in my power to rescue any fugitiveslave from the hands of any officer who attempts to return him to bondage. I will resist him as gently as I know how, but with such strength as I can command; I will ring the bells, and alarm the town; I will serve as head, as foot, or as hand to any body of serious and earnest men, who will go with me, with no weapons but their hands, in this work. I will do it as readily as I would lift a man out of the water, or pluck him from the teeth of a wolf, or snatch him from the hands of a murderer. What is a fine of a thousand dollars, and jailing for six months, to the liberty of a man? My money perish with me, if it A I I

Page 26 view page image

26 stand between me and the eternal law of God, I trust there are manly men enough in this house to secure the freedom of every fugitive slave in Boston, without breaking a limb or rending a garment. One thing more I think is very plain, that the fugitive has the same natural right to defend himself against the slave catcher, or his constitutional tool, that he has against a murderer or a wolf The man who attacks me to reduce me to slavery, in that moment of attack alienates his right to life, and if I were the fugitive, and could escape in no other way, I would kill him with as little compunction as I would drive a mosquito from my face. It is high time this was said. What grasshoppers we are before the law of men; what Goliaths against the law of God! What capitalist heeds your law of usury when he can get illegal interest? How many Banks are content with six per cent. when money is scarce? Did you never hear of a merchant evading the duties of the Custom house? When a man’s liberty is concerned  we must keep the law, must we? betray the wanderer, and expose the outcast? It has been said that the fugitive slave law cannot be executed in Boston.

Let us not be deceived, who would have thought a year ago, that the senator of Boston would make such a speech as that of last March, that so many of the leading citizens of Boston would write such a letter of approval, that such a law could pas’s congress, and a man be found in this city to vote for it and get no rebuke from the people! Here is an account of what took place in New York since the delivery of the sermon. [From the New York Tribune.] SLAVE CATCHING IN NEW YORK - FIRST CASE UND)ER THE LAW.

“The following case, which occurred yesterday, is one of peculiar interest, from the fact of its being the first movement under the new Fugitive Slave Law. Itwill be noticed that there is very little of the’

law’s delay’ here; the proceedings were as summary as an Arkansas court audience could desire. U.S. COMMISSIONER’S OFFICE Before Commissioner Gardiner.-Examination as to James Hamlet, charged to be a fugitive slave, the property of Mary A

Page 27 view page image

In the same manner the natural duty of a man overrides all the special obligations which a man takes on Brown of Baltimore.- No person was present as counsel for accused, and only one colored man. He is a light mulatto. The Marshal said Mr. Woodhadbeen there. The Commissioner said they would go on, and if counsel came in, he would read proceedings.

Thomas J. Clare, (a man with dark eyes and hair,) sworn:-Is 30 years of age; clerk for Merchant’s Shot Manufacturing Co. in Baltimore; knows James Hamlet; he is slave of Mary Brown, mother-in-law of mine, residing in Baltimore; have known Hamlet about 20 years; he left my mother-in-law about two years ago this season, by absenting himself from the premises, the dwelling where he resided in Baltimore; she is entitled to his services; he is a slave for life; she never parted with him voluntarily; she came into possession of him by will from John G. Brown, her deceased husband; the written paper shown is an extract from his will; she held him under that from the time she inherited him till he escaped, as I have testified; this is the man (pointing to H. a light mulatto man, about 24
or 25 years of age, looking exceedingly pensive.) Gustavus Brown, sworn-Am 25 years of age; reside in New York; clerk with A. M. Fenday, 25

Front-st.; resided before coming here in Baltimore; I know James Hamlet; I have known him since a boy; he is a slave to my mother; he is a slave for life; my mother inherited him under the will of my father; he left her service by running away, I suppose, absenting himself from the house in the city of Baltimore, about two years since; I have seen him several times, within the last six months, in the city; first time I saw him was in April last; my mother is still entitled to possession of him; she never has parted with him; the man sitting here (Hamlet) is the man. Mr. Asa Child, Counsellor at Law, here came into the room, and took his seat he said he had been sent to this morning, through another, by a gentleman with whom Hamlet had lived in this city, (Mr. S. N. Wood,) but he has no directions in the matter; he merely came to see that the law is properly administered, and supposed it would be without him. Mr. C. was then shown the law, the power of attorney to Mr. Clare, the affi davit of Mr. C. on which Hamlet was arrested-and the testimony thus far. Mr. Clare cross-examined by Mr. Child-I married Mrs. Brown’s daughter about 17
years ago; Hamlet has always lived with us in the family; I am in her family now, and was at the time he went away; think he is about 28 years of age (he looks much younger than that his features are very even, as those of a white person of the kind;) he occasionally worked at the Shot Tower where I worked; he was hired there as a laborer, and Mrs. Brown got the benefit of him -that is when I had no other use for him; he had formerly been employed as a drayman, after I married into the family some year or two, we lived toge ther, I furnishing the house; such wages as I got for the man it was returned to Mrs. B., to be used as she saw fit; I was her agent to get employment for him as I could; I had him in various occupations; I have a power of attorney; I have no further interest in him than he is her property, and we wish to get him back to Maryland again, where he left. Mr. Brown cross-examined-Left home 27th March last. Was home when Hamlet went away. At the time he was engaged at the Shot Tower business. Mr. Child said he had no further questions to ask. He supposed the rules of the law had been complied with. Mr. Gardiner, the Commissioner, then said, I will deliver the fugitive over to the Marshal, to be delivered over to the claimant. 27 -1 i r

Page 28 view page image

28 himself as a magistrate by his official oath. Our theory of office is this: the man is sunk in the magistrate; Mr. Child suggested if that was the law. The Commissioner then said he would hand him, as the law said, to the claimant, and if there should be any danger of rescue, he would deliver him to the U.S. Marshal. The United States Marshal said he had performed his duty in bringing him in. Mr. Clare said he would demand such aid from the United States Marshal as would secure the delivery of the man to his owner in Baltimore. Mr. Child suggested that it must be an affidavit that he apprehends a rescue, Mr. C. said that he did so apprehend. Mr. Talmadge, the Marshal, said he would have to perform his duty, if called upon. Mr. Child replied he supposed he would, but there were doubts as to the form. The necessary papers were made out by the Commissioner, Mr. Clare swearing he feared a rescue, and Hamlet was delivered to him, thence to the U. S. Marshal, and probably was conveyed with all possible despatch to Baltimore, a coach being in waiting at the door; and he was taken off in irons, an officer accompanying the party.

Here is the charge of Judge McLean in a similar case. “No earthly power has a right to interpose between a man’s conscience and his Maker. He has a right, an inalienable and absolute right, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience. For this he alone must answer, and he is entirely free from all human restraint to think and act for himself.

“But this is not the case when his acts affect the rights of others.

Society has a claim upon all its citizens. General rules have been adopted in the form of laws, for the protection of the rights of persons and things. These laws lie at the foundation of the social compact, and their observance is essential to the maintenance of civilization. In these matters the law, and not conscience, constitutes the rule of action. You are sworn to decide this case according to the law and testimony; and you become unfaithful to the solemn injunctions you have taken upon yourselves, when you yield to an influence which you call conscience, that places you above the law and the testimony. “Such a rule can only apply to individuals; and when asssumed as a basis of action on the rights of others, it is utterly destructive of all law. What may be deemed a conscientious act by one individual, may be held criminal by another. In view of one, the act is meritorious; in the view of the other, it should be punished as a crime. And each has the same right, acting under the dictates of his conscience, to carry out his own view. This would overturn the basis of society. We must stand by the law. We have sworn to maintain it. It is expected that the citizens of the free States should be opposed to slavery. But with the abstract principles of slavery we have nothing to do. As a political question there could be no difference of opinion among us on the subject. But our duty is found in the constitution of the Union, as construed by the Supreme Court. The fugitives from labor we are bound, by the highest obligations, to deliver up on claim of the master being made; and there is no State power which can release the slave from the legal custody of his master. “In regard to the arrest of fugitives from labor, the law does not impose active duties on our citizens generally.

They are not prohibited from exercising the ordinary charities of life towards the fugitive. To secrete him or convey him !4 I a

Page 29 view page image

29 he is un hormme convert; his individual manhood is covered up and extinguished by his official cap; he is from the reach of his master, or to rescue him when in legal custody, is forbidden; and for doing this a liability is incurred. This gives to no one a just ground of complaint.

Hle has only to refrain from an express violation of the law, which operates to the injury of his neighbor.” He seems to think the right to hold slaves as much a natural Right as the absolute right to worship God according to the “dictates of conscience.” One man has an unalienable right to liberty, other men an unalienable right to alienate and take it from him! Here is something in a different spirit. THE FUGITIVE SLAVE

BILL. This infamous bill has finally passed both branches of Congress.* My opinion on this subject may have but little weight with those who voted for it, but may help sustain the sinking spirit of some poor disconsolate one, who, having fled from the land of oppressors, is anxiously looking to see if there is any one who will give him a cheering look, or a kind reception, or who dares to give him a crust of bread, or a cup of water, and help him on his way. Allow me to say to such an one, that if pursued by the merciless slaveholder, and every other door in Boston is shut against him, there is a door that will be open St No. 2 Beach street, and that the fear of fines and imprisonment will be ineffectual when the pursuer shall demand his victim. If he enters before the fleeing captive is safe, it will be at his peril. I am opposed to war, and all the spirit of war; even to all preparations for what is called self defence in times of peace; yet I should resist the pursuer, and not allow him to enter my dwelling until he was able to tread me under his feet. I will not trample upon any law, either of my own State, or of the nation, that does not conflict with my conscientious duty to my God; but Jesus has commanded, saying’All things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them.’ If, for no crime, I had been taken and sold, and deprived of all the rights of my manhood, and degraded to the rank of a beast of burden; not only deprived of the opportunity to labor for the support of my wife and children, but even deprived of their kind sympathy and companionship, whenever the interest or will of my oppressors should require it; and I should, at the peril of my life, flee from my oppressors and they should pursue me to the dwelling of some poor disciple of Jesus, it may be that of a colored man, and I should beg of him to protect me, and help me to escape from the pursuer’s grasp, should I not hope if he was a Christian, he would give me bread and water, and help me on my way, regardless of the fines and imprisonment that such a kind act might render him liable to! Could I expect to meet the approbation of my Lord, if I did not do as much for the fleeing slave? Can there be a Christian, in this land of the Pilgrims, who will not do it, and besides, do all in his power to prevent any one of those Senators or Representativesin Con * I call this bill infamous, because by it the man or woman who is charged with being a slave is deprived of all the means of self-defence allowed to those who arecharged with crinmes, and to be delivered up summarily, without the right of trial by jury, or any other proper means of proving the charge groundless. Is it a worse crime to be a slave than a thief or a murderer? I I

Page 30 view page image

30 no longer a man, but-a mere president, general, governor, representative, sheriff, juror, or constable; he gress who voted for that infamous bill from ever again misrepresenting any portion of the friends of freedom, in Boston or elsewhere? It is said, this is a law of the land, and must be obeyed, to such I would say, “Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto men more than unto God judge ye.” I prefer to obey God, if in so doing I must break the laws of men and be punished, rather than violate the laws of God and obey the laws of men, to escape fines and imprisonments, or even death. Boston, Sept. 23, 1850. T. GILBERT. THE

FUGITIVE SLAVE BILL. MESSRS. EDITORS:-The bold and manly avo val of your correspondent, Mr. T. Gilbert, in last evening’s Traveller, in commenting upon what he very justly denominates the’infamous fugitive slave bill,’ is but the very echoing of thousands of hearts equally true to the cause of freedom, and who seek the elevation of the down-trodden sons and daughters of American slavery. That gentleman, acting upon the dictates of an enlightened patriotism, and in deep sympathy with the fleeing captive, has the courage to avow his determination to throw wide open his door, and offers to make his house-even though he should stand alone among his fellow-citizens-an asylum to the fugitive slave, in his retreat from the prison-house of bondage. The paramount claims which he awards to the Divine law over that which is but human, and therefore necessarily imperfect, commend his spirited letter to the consideration of all those that have in any way’aided in the passage of a bill at variance with the first principles of civil freedom, and in direct hostility to the instruction of that great Teacher who hath commanded us to’ do unto others as we would that they should do unto us.’ That the determination of your correspondent may be true and unfaltering, is the hearty prayer of one at least, of his fellow-citizens, who is ready at all times to cooperate in making an asylum for the fugitive slave, even though bonds and imprisonment should prove the penalty. Boston, Sept. 26th, 1850. GEORGE W.

CARNES. Here follow some characteristic remarks on the terror which the fugitives feel in apprehension of being torn from their families and their freedom. THE FUGITIVE SLAVE LAW. “The colored people had a grand time last evening, at Zion’s Chapel, in Church street. Their object was, to denounce the fugitive slave law; and this was done with hearty good will, or, we should say, malediction. The steam would have been well up, without any extraneous elements of excitement; but what added a special interest to the occasion, and raised the temperament to blood heat, was the announcement, made by Mllr. Downing, that the wife of James Hamlet (the fugitive slave who was returned to his owner in Baltimore, a few days since, under a process of law,) had died yesterday, of grief and convulsions. This filled the measure of indignation which burned in the bosoms of all present, against a law which, besides its other abominations, could produce such fatal effects. In the fever of the moment, a contribution was called for, to defray the expense of her funeral, and about $20 was collected. Shortly after, information was received that it was all a mistake about her dying of convulsions, or in any other way; and that she was as well as ever. ‘Al I

Page 31 view page image

31 is absolved from all allegiance to God’s law of the universe when it conflicts with man’s law of the land; his official business as a magistrate supersedes his natural duty as a man. In virtue of this theory president Polk, and his coadjutors in congress and out of it, with malice aforethought and intent to rob and to kill, did officially invade Mexico, and therein “slay, kill and murder” some thousands of men, as well Americans as Mexicans. This is thought right because he did it officially.

But the fact that he and they were magistrates, doing official business, did not make the killing any the less a wrong than if he and they had been private men with general Lopez and not general Taylor to head or back them. The official killing of a man who has not alienated his right to life, is just as much a violation of the law of God, and the natural duty of a man, as the unofficial killing of such a person. Because you and I and some other foolish people put a man in a high office, and get him to take an oath, does that, all at once, invest him with a natural right to kill any body he sees fit; to kill an innocent Mexiean, All his natural rights he had before, and it would be difficult to ascertain where the people could find the right to authorize him to do a wrong. A man does not escape from the jurisdiction of natural law and the dominion of God by enlisting This was a damper upon the enthusiasm of the occasion, but the money was already collected, and seeing it could not be applied just now to defray her funeral expenses, it was very properly decided to apply it to her living expenses. The meeting adjourned. Mrs. Hamlet was in our office yesterday, accompanied by her mother and a colored man. She appeared to be in good health, (though of course distressed at the misfortune of her husband,) and we hope she will live a thousand years.

She certainly shall, if his return will have that effect. [N. Y. J. of Corn.] I print these passages hoping that some hundred years hence they may be found in some old library and valued as monuments of the state of Christianity in the Free States in the year 1850.

Page 32 view page image

32 in the army, or by taking the oath of the president; for Justice, the law paramount of the universe, extends over armies and nations. A little while - ago a murderer was hanged in Boston, by the sheriff of Suffolk county, at the command of the governor and council of Massachusetts, by the aid of certain persons called grand and petit jurors, all of them acting in their official capacity and doing the official business they had sworn to do. If it be a wrong thing to hang a man, or to take his life except in self-defence and while in imminent peril, then it is not any less a wrong because men do it in their official character, in compliance with their oath. I am speaking of absolute wrong, not merely what is wrong relatively to the man’s own judgment, for I doubt not that all those officers were entirely conscientious in what they did, and therefore no blame rests on them. But if a man believes it wrong to take human life deliberately, except in the cases named, then I do not see how he can be partaker in the death of any man, notwithstanding his official oath. Let me suppose a case which may happen here and before long. A woman flies from South Carolina to Massachusetts to escape from bondage. Mr.

Greatheart aids her in her escape, harbors and conceals her, and is brought to trial for it. The punishment is a fine of one thousand dollars and imprisonment for six months. I am drawn to serve as a juror and pass upon this offence. I may refuse to serve and be punished for that, leaving men with no scruples to take my place, or I may take the juror’s oath to give a verdict according to the law and the testimony. The law is plain, let us suppose, and the testimony conclusive. Greatheart himself confesses that he did the deed alleged, saving I I

Page 33 view page image

33 one ready to perish. The judge charges that if the jurors are satisfied of that fact then they must return that he is guilty. This is a nice matter. Here are two questions. The one, put to me in my official capacity as juror, is this: “Did Greatheart aid the woman ” The other, put to me in my natural character as man, is this: “Will you help punish Greatheart with fine and imprisonment for helping a woman obtain her unalienable rights?” If I have extinguished my manhood by my juror’s oath, then I shall do my official business and find Greatheart guilty, and I shall seem to be a true man; but if I value my manhood I shall answer after my natural duty to love a man and not hate him, to do him justice, not injustice, to allow him the natural rights he has not alienated, and shall say” Not guilty.” They men will call me forsworn and a liar, but I think human nature will justify the verdict.* In cases of this kind it seems to me a conscientious man must either refuse to serve as juror, or return a verdict at variance with the facts and his official business as juror; but men’s eyes have been so long blinded by quibbles of law, that they will help inflict such a punishment on their brother, and the judge decree the sentence, in a case where the arrest, the verdict and the sentence are the only wrong in which the prisoner is concerned. It seems to me it is time this matter should be understood, and that it should be known that no official oath can take a man out of the jurisdiction of God’s natural law of the universe. A case may be brought before a commissioner or judge of the United States, to determine whether Daniel is a slave and therefore to be surrendered up. His * I think most men will declare the verdict of “not guilty” in the case of J. P. Zenger, tried for high treason in New York in 1735, a righteous judgment, but it was plainly contrary to the evidence. 3

‘rv t

Page 34 view page image

34 official business, sanctioned by his oath, enforced by the law of the land, demands the surrender; his natural duty, sanctioned by his Conscience, enforced by absolute Justice, forbids the surrender. What shall he do? There is no serving of God and Mammon both. He may abandon his commission and refuse to remain thus halting between two opposites.

But if he keeps his office, I see not how he can renounce his nature and send back a fugitive slave, and do as great a wrong as to make a free man a slave! Suppose the constitution had been altered, and congress had made a law making it the business of the United States commissioners to enslave and sell at public outcry all the red-haired men in the nation and forbid us to aid and abet their escape, to harbor or conceal them under the same penalties just now mentioned; do you think any commissioner would be justified by his oath in kidnapping the men, or any person in punishing such as harbored or concealed them, such as forcibly took the victims out of the hand of officials who would work mischief by statute? Will the color of a hair make right wrong, and wrong right? Suppose a man has sworn to keep the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution is found to be wrong in certain particulars; then his oath is not morally binding, for before his oath, by his very existence, he is morally bound to keep the law of God as fast as he learns it. No oath can absolve him from his natural allegiance to God. Yet I see not how a man can knowingly, and with a good Conscience, swear to keep what he deems it wrong to keep, and will not keep, and does not intend to keep. It seems to me very strange that men so misunderstand the rights of Conscience and their obligations to obey their country. Not long ago, an eminent man -1 i

Page 35 view page image

35 taunted one of his opponents, telling him he had better adhere to the “higher law.” The newspapers echoed the sneer, as if there were no law higher than the Constitution. Latterly, the democratic party, even more completely than the whig party, seems to have forgotten that there is any law higher than the Constitution, any rights above vested rights. An eminent theologian of New England, who has hitherto done good and great service in his profession, grinding off the barb of Calvinism, wrote a book in defence of slave-catching, on “Conscience and the Constitution,” a book which not only sins against the sense of the righteous in being wicked, but against the worldliness of the world in being weak,  and he puts the official business of keeping ” a compact” far before the natural duty of keeping a Conscience void of offence, and serving God. But suppose forty thieves assemble on Fire Island, and make a compact to rob every vessel wrecked on their coast, and reduce the survivors to bondage.

Suppose I am born amongst that brotherhood of pirates, am I morally bound to keep that compact, or to perform any function which grows out of it?

Nay, I am morally bound to violate the compact, to keep the pirates from their plunder and their prey. Instead of forty thieves on Fire Island, suppose twenty millions of men in the Ujnited States make a compact to enslave every sixth man, - the dark men, am I morally bound to heed that compact, or to perform any function which grows out of it? Nay, I am morally bound to violate the compact, in every way that is just and wise.

The very men who make such a compact are morally discharged from it as soon as they see it is wrong. The forty Jews who bound themselves by wicked oath to kill Paul before they broke their fast, - were they morally bound to keep:their word? Nay, morally bound to break it. i I i

Page 36 view page image

36 I will tell you a portion of the story of a fugitive slave whom I have known. I will call his name Jo seph, though he was in worse than Egyptian bondage. He was “owned” by a notorious gambler, and once ran away, but was retaken. His master proceeded to punish him for that crime, took him to a chamber, locked the door and lighted a fire; he then beat the slave severely. After that he put the branding-iron in the fire, took a knife -I am not telling of what took place in Algiers, but in Alabama-and proceeded to cut off the ears of his victim! The owner’s wife, alarmed at the shrieks of the sufferer, beat down the door with a sledge-hammer, and prevented that catastrophe. Afterwards, two slaves of this gambler, for stealing their master’s sheep, were beaten so that they died of the stripes. The ” Minister” came to the funeral, told the others that those were wicked slaves, who deserved their fate; that they would never “rise”

in the general resurrection, and were not fit to be buried! Accordingly their bodies were thrown into a hole and left there. Joseph ran away again; he came to Boston; was sheltered by a man whose charity never fails; he has been in my house, and often has worshipped here with us.

Shall I take that man and deliver him up? do it:’ with alacrity? ” Shall I suffer that gambler to carry his prey from this city? Will you allow it-though all the laws and constitutions of men give the commandment? God do so unto us if we suffer it. This we need continually to remember: that nothing in the world without is so sacred as the eternal law of God; of the world within nothing is more venerable than our own Conscience, the permanent, everlasting oracle of God. The Urim and Thummim were but Jewish and Egyptian toys on the breastplate of the Hebrew priest; the Delphic oracle was but a subtle i -1 i

Page 37 view page image

cheat, but this is the true Shekinah and presence of God in your heart: as this ” pronounces lastly on each deed, Of so much fame in heaven expect your meed.” If I am consciously and continually false to this, it is of no avail that I seem loyal to all besides; I make the light that is in me darkness, and how great is that darkness! The centre of my manhood is gone, and I am rotten at my heart. Men may respect me, honor me, but I am not respectable, I am a base, dishonorable man, and like a tree, broad branched, and leafed with green, but all its heart gnawed out by secret worms, at some slight touch one day, my rotten trunk will fall with horrid squelch, bringing my leafy honors to dishonored dust, and men will wonder that bark could hide such rottenness and ruin. But if I am true to this Legate of God, holding his court within my soul, then my power to discover the just and right will enlarge continually; the axis of my little life will coincide with the life of infinite God, His Conscience and my own be one. Then my character and my work will lie in the plane of his Almighty action; no other will in me, his infinite wisdom, justice, holiness and love will flow into me, a ceaseless tide, filling with life divine and new the little creeklets of my humble soul. I shall be one with God, feel His delight in me and mine in Him, and all my mortal life run o’er with life divine and bless mankind. Let men abhor me, yea scourge and crucify, angels are at hand; yes the Father is with me! How we mistake. Men think if they can but get wickedness dignified into a statute, enrolled in the Capitol, signed by the magistrates, and popular with the people that all is secure. Then they rejoice, and at 37 f 41 L

Page 38 view page image

their “thanksgiving dinner,” say with the short lived tyrant in the play, after he had slain the rightful heirs of England’s throne, and set his murderous hoof on Justice at every step to power: ” Now is the winter of our discontent Made glorious summer”.. and think that Sin sits fast and rides secure. But no law of men is ever fixed on man till it be first the absolute, the right, the law of God. All else lasts but its day, forever this, forever still the same. By “previous questions,” men may stop debate, vote down minorities with hideous grin, but the still small voice of Justice will whisper in the human heart, will be trumpet-tongued in history to teach you that you cannot vote down God. lIn your private character, if you would build securely you must build on the natural law of God, inherent in your nature and in His; if the nation would build securely it must build so. Out of their caprice, their selfishness and their sin, may men make laws, to last for a day, built up with joyous huzzas, and the chiming of a hundred guns, to come down with the curses of the multitude, and smitten by the thunder of God, - but to build secure, you must build on the Justice of the Almighty. The beatitudes of Jesus will outlast the codes of all the tyrants of the old world and the new. So I have seen gamblers hurry and huddle up their booths at a country muster, on the unsmoothed surface of a stubble field, foundation good enough for such a structure, not a post plumb, to last a single day of riot, drunkenness and sin, but to build a pyramid which shall outlast empires, men lay bare the bosom of the primeval rock, and out of primeval rock they build thereon their well joined work, outlasting Syria, Gece, Carthage, Rome, 38 -i 1, .)

Page 39 view page image

3,9 venerable to Time, and underneath its steadfast foot the earthquakes pass all harmlessly away. All things conspire to overturn a wrong. Every advance of man is hostile to it. Reason is hostile; religion is its deadly foe; the new born generation will assail it, and it must fall. Of old it was written, though hand join in hand the wicked shall not prosper,” and the world’s wide walls, from the remotest bounds of peopled space, laugh out their loud and long “Amen!” Let Iniquity be never so old and respectable, get all the most eminent votes, have the newspapers on her side, guns fired at her successit all avails nothing, for this is God’s world, not a devil’s, and His eternal word has gone forth that Right alone shall last forever and forever. Oh young man, now in the period of the passions reverence your Conscience. Defer that to no appetite, to no passion, to no foolish compliance with other men’s ways, to no ungodly custom, even if become a law. Ask always, “Is it right for me ” Be brave and self-denying for Conscience’ sake. Fear not to differ from men; keeping your modesty, keep your integrity also. Let not even your discretion consume your valor. Fear not to be scrupulously upright and pure; be afraid neither of men’s hate, nor even of their laugh and haughty scorn, but shudder at the thought of tampering with your sense of Right, even in the smallest matters. The Flesh will come up with deceitful counsels; the Spirit teaching the commandments of God; give both their due. Be not the senses’ slave, but the soul’s free man. Oh brother man, who once wert young, in the period of ambition or beyond it, if such a time there be, can you trust the selfishness, the caprice, th6 passions, and the sin of men, before your own Conscience, renounce i

Page 40 view page image

40 the law of God for the customs of men! When your volcanic mountain has been capped with snow, Interest, subtler than all the passions of the flesh, comes up to give her insidious counsel. “On our side,” says she “is the applause of men; feasting is with us; the wise and prudent are here also, yea the ancient and honorable, men much older than thy father; and with gray hairs mottling thy once auburn head, wilt thou forsake official business, its solid praise, and certain gain, for the phantom of natural duty, renounce allegiance to warm human lies for the cold truth of God remote and far!” Say, ” get thee behind me,” to such counsellors; “I will not stainmy age by listening to your subterranean talk.” Oh Brother-man, or old or young, how will you dare come up before your God and say: ” Oh Lord, I heard, I heard thy voice in my soul, at times still and small, at times a trumpet talking with me of the Right, the eternal Right, but I preferred the low counsels of the flesh; the commands of Interest I kept; I feared the rich man’s decorous rage; I trembled at the public roar, and I scorned alike my native Duty and Thy natural Law. Lo here is the talent thou gavest me, my Sense of Right. I have used each other sense, this only have I hid;‘tis eaten up with rust, but thus I bring it back to thee. Take what is Thine!” Who would dare thus to sin against infinite Justice? Who would wish to sin against it when it is also infinite Love, and the Law of Right is but the highway on which the Almighti: ness of the Father comes out to meet his prodigal, a great way off, penitent and returning home, or unrepentant still, refusing to be comforted, and famishing on draff and husks while there is bread of heavenly life, enough and yet to spare-comes out to meet.us, to take us home, and to bless us forever and forever.!. i l i 4.

Powered by DLXS

To comment or inquire about content, contact moa-feedback@umich.edu To report errors, contact umdl-help@umich.edu Reprint Information for this collection